Why I won’t read your free book on Kindle

What is awesome about Kindle and the self-publishing age is that there are tons of books out there that are being sold for 99 cents or even free of charge. Free books are fairly common. Authors who have put up the second book of a series often offer the first book free for a little while. Writers who are looking for more readers will do the same thing. Authors who now have several titles will offer older ones for free. It’s good marketing strategy. If one self publishes, and has to do the marketing oneself, then these are good ways to get readers interested. There’s even websites and blogs that will alert you to what free titles are available.

I thought that this would be wonderful. I have a ginormous reading habit and a limited budget for books. I am more than willing to pay for future books if I have enjoyed the free one. In fact, that gives me and my limited funds a sense of security. It’s safer to spend money on a book when you know that you enjoy the author’s writing already. Me, I’ll read almost anything.

There’s the rub. The key to that phrase is “almost.” My life is on a timer, and someday those seconds will run out. In a world full of amazing tales, I don’t have time for bad books.

I'll drive through Kansas in a dust storm, but I won't waste my time on bad books.

I’ll drive through Kansas in a dust storm, but I won’t waste my time on bad books.

I have looked at many free books and I’m sure that I’ll download one eventually. So far, I haven’t. I’ll tell you two reasons why.

1. Your description sucks.
It’s the same as query letters. It doesn’t matter if your book is the most awesome and well written tale in the cosmos. If your description is bad, I’m not reading it. Not even for free.

Here’s some examples of what I mean. No titles or author names—I’m not trying to shame anyone or put them off writing. For heaven’s sake, if you see your description here, don’t freak out. Work on making it better.

New York. 2120. American has been decimated, wiped out from the second Civil War.

(Edit due to error pointed out by alert reader. Thanks alert reader!) I had originally had some snarky umbrage here about the use of the word “decimate.” This is a word I automatically think of the meaning as “reduced by ten percent.” It also has a common usage that basically means the same as “wiped out,” so now I’m just annoyed by the redundancy. The whole first bit of this description turns me off. A city, a place, a badly-worded event that is backstory. It leaves me wondering what this book is about and why I would read it in the first place. It could be brilliant, but I’ll never know because I’m not wasting my time on reading one more word of this description.

Evil erupts. Four are called. The universe awaits.

Oooooh, short mysterious sentences! How original! Stop trying to be coy and tell me what the book is about. Nope, too late, you’ve already lost me.

Evil erupts!  Oh, wait, it's just a weird butterfly.

Evil erupts! Oh, wait, it’s just a weird butterfly.

Once soulmates, the witch and warlock covens of the California coast have been estranged for a century.

I’m reading this one over my dead body. One, “soul mates” is two words. Merriam-Webster says it’s been that way since the phrase came to be in 1822. Two: There are exactly 1,235,692,876.5 books about witches and covens out there at the moment. If you aren’t going to tell me in the first line why yours is different, then my eyes are going to glaze over and I’ll move on to the next offering. Bonus Three: Don’t start with backstory.

It’s the summer of 1976 and Vince Moody is a quiet and unassuming projectionist at the run-down Empire cinema in the small town of Langbridge in the middle of the Somerset Levels.

Oh my fucking wombats. How many details can you stuff into an opening sentence? Well, all of them if you are Dickens. Free book writer–you are not Dickens. Stop using your synopsis for a description. I don’t need to know the MC’s entire life story in your opening sentence. I don’t need to know that he lives in Langbridge or where that city is. You should be showing me why I want to read about your MC, but I already hate him. I hate Vince because he made me read that stupid sentence.

Free book writers- for wombat’s sake, please take the time to learn to write a good and effective description. This is what sells the book. Don’t make me want to jab out my own eyes with a pointed stick rather than read your book!

2. Your writing sucks.

That’s harsh. I know it is. The self-publishing world has some wonderful and well written stories in it. That is, if you can find them through the oceans of crap.

There are more poorly written books e-published today that there are specks of dirt in this dust storm.

There are more poorly written books e-published today that there are specks of dirt in this dust storm.

The e-book world has this wonderful feature that lets you read the first few pages of a book. If I like the description, the first few pages are what I look at next. The first few pages of all the free books I have looked at so far have been bad. Very bad.

I think that the problem is this. Anyone can self-publish these days. So they do. In most cases, the first book you write, and the second, and the third, aren’t going to be trade published. Why should they? Do you want to pay for a haircut from someone who is cutting hair for the first time? It takes time to develop a good writing style and well-crafted tales. It takes practice to write a novel worth reading, even for free. However, with the ease of self-publishing, aspiring writers are putting their first work out there in the public eye right away.

This practice isn’t helping anyone. It’s not helping the readers, because they are tired of slogging through poorly written work to try to find the diamond in the rough. It hurts green writers because they can’t help but get discouraged when the sales don’t come rolling in. I imagine that many give up writing altogether, though they should not. No matter how clever one is, it takes practice to craft a good novel. Take that time now, before you publish. If you don’t, and put your work out for the world to see and judge, you might be shooting yourself in the foot. If I hate your first book, published before it’s time, why should I give you another chance when you write your fifth book? Even if it is the best novel in the whole history of the whole history, it’s too late. I’ve already been disappointed in your writing before, and I won’t be willing to spend my limited book buying funds on you again. Learn to write with some sense of style and grace. Then, and only then, publish your work.

To mitigate the harshness of my words, a cute baby duckie!

To mitigate the harshness of my words, a cute baby duckie!

About JulianneQJohnson

I am a writer in Indiana who lives with two cats, two ferrets, and one fiance. I enjoy cheap coffee and expensive chocolate.
This entry was posted in E-books, reading, Self Publishing, writing, Writing Advice and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Why I won’t read your free book on Kindle

  1. linnetmoss says:

    There’s a lot of truth in what you say, but I don’t think it is anything to do with the pricing. Plenty of pricier self-published books are also in dire need of editing. BTW, since we are being sticklers, “decimate” also has a more general meaning: “kill or destroy a large part of.”

    • It doesn’t have anything to do with pricing. My point was that there are some books I wouldn’t even read for free, but the problem exists elsewhere as well.
      And too true about the other meaning of “decimate!” I missed that completely. I assumed that the two phrases had different meaning because otherwise it’s just annoyingly redundant.

  2. Kylie Betzner says:

    As harsh as your post comes across, it makes several fair points. As a reader I’m tired of blowing .99 or even $1 on slopped together stories. As a writer, who has spent countless hours editing (not to mention a small fortune in editing services) I don’t appreciate writers throwing poor writing out there. It’s not that their stories and ideas are bad, but they did not take the time to polish.

    • Too true. And, all natural snarkiness aside, I’m not trying to discourage writers from writing. We all start somewhere. Oh my goodness, but you should see my first three novel length stories. Man, have I come a long way! All I’m trying to say is that it might be wise not to publish those first three novel length stories.

      • Kylie Betzner says:

        Or at least run ’em by an editor. A lot of these novels have been poorly edited.

      • An excellent suggestion. In many cases, I would recommend a content as well as grammar edit.

      • Kylie Betzner says:

        Naturally. I have three editors: two of them edit for content and one edits for grammar. Grammar is important but I think the content editors have had the most impact on my writing overall.

      • Getting good editors, or even good betas, is not only a good way to polish, but a great way to improve one’s writing as well. I wish everyone would, or could afford to, do that.

      • Kylie Betzner says:

        Yeah, the only problem is it is very expensive. Thankfully, I have 3 friends from college who went into professional writing as a major. That helps.

        But when you price other editors, their rates are outrageous. But to make money, you’ve got to spend money.

      • Kylie Betzner says:


  3. Tina Cones says:

    Love this. I do read free books, though I tend to be picky. And mitigate is my favorite word today!

    • I just now “bought” my first free e-book on Kindle. After writing this blog post, I finally found one that passed the description and first pages test. Hopefully, I’ll find more!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s